Last week in Berlin I attended an evening lecture given by Mikhail Ryklin. Ryklin has the reputation of Russia's leading philosopher in the city (note: he was also the husband of the late artist Anna Mikhalchuk, IZO), and so I went along in some anticipation. But I was disappointed. His talk (delivered in German) was a matter of polemics rather than philosophy. He began with the hoary notion that Moscow aspires to the status of the Third Rome, using this as a connector between Stalin and Putin-Medvedev regimes. Then he focused on the state of art censorship in Russia today, with particular attention to the Forbidden Art trial (IZO). The major artist-hero of the resistance, in Ryklin's view, seems to be Alexander Kosolapov, author of the painting This Is My Blood, which juxtaposes Jesus and Coca-Cola. What Ryklin had to say wasn't so much controversial as - coming from a leading academic and intellectual - superficial and boring. It was a rehash of the dissident analyses of Soviet power in the 50s-80s with emphasis now on the repressive tendencies of the Church rather than the Party. At one point Ryklin juxtaposed two events: the receipt by Ilya Kabakov of the Order of Friendship from President Medvedev, and criticism of a work by Kabakov by church activists, and stated that he couldn't logically reconcile these two events. Well, of course he couldn't, because he posits an old-style monolithic Establishment in which there is not a sliver of light between the political and the religious elites, the FSB and the Church. But this is plainly not the case. And Ryklin didn't mention the influential liberal-oligarchic establishment - much of it Jewish - in the form of such figures as Abramovich (who sponsors the Garage), Mamut (owner of LiveJournal), Lebedev and Prokhorov (publishers), Yuri Milner ("owner of half the Russian internet") etc.